Are you trying to figure out what type of PMOS (formerly PCOS) you have? Adrenal? Inflammatory? Wait, no… post-pill? Insulin-resistant? Maybe you see yourself in a few of the buckets at once and you’re trying to work out how to split yourself between them. A lot of people get stuck right here, because it feels like everyone else has it figured out and knows exactly which bucket they’re in. So let’s talk about PCOS types: where they come from, why they sound so legit, and why they often aren’t as helpful as they seem.
▶ Liked this video? Subscribe to my YouTube channel.
In this article
What do people mean by PCOS types?
Here’s the first source of confusion: the word “type” is being used in two completely different ways, and they get blurred together all the time. One is the popular subtypes you’ve seen online (adrenal, inflammatory, insulin-resistant, post-pill). The other is the four research phenotypes (you might have seen them as phenotype A, B, C, or D). They are not the same thing, so let’s take them one at a time.
Are the popular subtypes a real diagnosis?
The popular subtypes come from mechanism-based theories. They were a way to explain the different reasons PCOS might show up in someone’s body, and that instinct isn’t a bad one. But they aren’t medical diagnoses, they aren’t used in research papers, and they don’t appear in the clinical guidelines. What happened next is the issue: those ideas got turned into fixed categories, and then we built protocols, supplement stacks, even specific diets and workouts around each bucket.
And here’s the truth, the reason so many people come to me frustrated: PCOS doesn’t fit in a neat little bucket. You can be insulin-resistant and have inflammation. There’s so much overlap that people end up trying to split themselves across buckets and merge different protocols, and it gets messy. If you’ve always struggled to fit into one… congratulations. You just figured out why this doesn’t work ahead of everyone else. The good news is that a lot of the evidence-based suggestions actually help several of the “buckets” at the same time. Things get better together.
What are the four Rotterdam phenotypes?
Now the other meaning of “type.” Because PCOS is diagnosed on meeting two of three criteria, it can genuinely look different from one person to the next, and the phenotypes just describe which diagnostic features are present. This isn’t about mechanisms like insulin or inflammation… it’s about what’s actually there on the diagnostic picture:
- Phenotype A: all three features, irregular cycles, high androgens, and ovarian morphology (elevated AMH or ultrasound).
- Phenotype B: irregular cycles and high androgens, but no ovarian morphology.
- Phenotype C: ovarian morphology and high androgens, but regular cycles.
- Phenotype D: irregular cycles and ovarian morphology, but no high-androgen symptoms.
These groupings are genuinely useful for studying large patterns across big populations, and I’m a proponent of that research. It may tell us whether certain groups carry higher or lower risk of certain things, and that’s a step in the right direction.
Why don’t phenotypes tell you what to do?
Where it misses the mark is when we stretch population data onto the individual person in front of us. Even if something is more likely in one phenotype, it doesn’t mean it can’t happen in another. So if one phenotype is “higher risk” for insulin resistance, you should still be screening for insulin resistance in all the others anyway, because the label isn’t a way to exclude it. That actually mirrors the PCOS guideline and what the brightest minds in PCOS care are saying: screen everyone, then individualize based on what’s showing up for you and what isn’t, because you checked. I’m not saying the mechanisms don’t matter. I just don’t think grouping people by them is as helpful as it sounds.
Where do the labels backfire?
Being told you’re “the adrenal type” or “the inflammatory type” can feel like a lightbulb moment, like something finally makes sense. But what usually comes next is “take these supplements, avoid these foods, do this workout,” all built on the idea of one root cause and a one-size protocol. So what if you don’t fit just one? What if your insulin is high and your stress is off the charts? What if your androgens were high two years ago but have come down since? A fixed type can lock you into a plan that doesn’t evolve with you. I’ve seen someone decide they’re “not insulin-resistant” because they aren’t gaining weight, so they never test it. Or get so afraid of “spiking cortisol” that they avoid the exact workout they love and would actually do consistently. The reality: once you’re diagnosed, PCOS is an enduring condition, but it isn’t frozen in time. It adapts to what you’re doing, and your care should too.
What I use instead of fixed types
This is why I don’t use fixed types. Instead I use something that reflects where your body is right now. I call it the PCOS profile, and it’s not a type. It’s a flexible, science-informed way to look at the whole picture, figure out what’s relevant for you right now, and track what we’re watching so we can notice changes before they get loud. It respects real life, that you have constraints and priorities and can’t do everything at once. So if you have no idea which “type” you are, you don’t need to feel bad. And if you feel really dogmatic that you’re a certain type, it probably just matched an adaptation that’s working for you, and that’s good feedback. I’m not saying throw the bathwater out with the baby (an expression I genuinely don’t understand, by the way). I’m saying don’t assume you live in the same bucket forever. Maybe it’s time to let go of the labels and just do a comprehensive assessment of where you’re actually at.
▶ Want the full walk-through, including all four phenotypes? Watch the complete video here.
Is this you?
Shift Society is my free community for women navigating PMOS (formerly PCOS) and metabolic health. When you join, you also get my free Lab Clarity Mini-Series & Checklist to help you make sense of your bloodwork, plus all the free resources from my videos. Real science, real talk. If that’s you, come join us.
Ready to look at your own picture?
If you’re in BC, a Clarity Call is a free, up to 15 minute fit conversation, not a medical visit. We figure out whether working together makes sense, and I point you in the right direction either way.
Virtual across BC · No pressure, ever
This article is educational, not medical advice or a diagnosis. If something here resonates, bring it to your healthcare team, who can look at it through the lens of your individual health.
Main references
- Teede HJ, et al. Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023. PubMed